Patch management may appear straightforward, but MSPs without proper tools face significant challenges. This Q Labs field guide walks MSP operatives through the selection process for optimal patch management solutions. 

MSP Patch Management: Mission-Critical Operations 

While patch management should remain uncomplicated, MSPs lacking appropriate tools encounter substantial difficulties. Moreover, substandard patch management approaches create long-term costs for both MSPs and their clients. 

A Ponemon Institute study found that most data breaches (57%) result from attackers exploiting known vulnerabilities that required patches but never received them. For MSPs concerned about financial implications, consider this: the average total cost of a data breach in the United States reaches $8.64 million. 

The conclusion seems clear—effective patch management solutions cost substantially less than breach remediation. Additionally, current automation capabilities in patch management increase effectiveness while reducing human error potential. MSPs seeking top-tier patch management tools will find valuable selection criteria in this Q Labs assessment. 

Strategic Value of Proper MSP Patch Management Tools 

Patch management represents a cybersecurity protocol for systematic, consistent updating of software, operating systems, and applications. Purpose-built patch management platforms help MSPs classify, prioritize, and apply patches promptly to maintain client networks with current security. 

Poor patch management consequences appear stark: heightened security risks, wasted resources, and damaged client trust. Conversely, effective patch management creates numerous advantages for MSPs and their clients. 

Current patch management practices increase client productivity by preventing system failures and downtime that halt business operations. Many patches include performance enhancements and new features that improve usability. 

Proper patch management helps MSPs keep client systems running efficiently while protecting against external cyber threats. According to Ponemon research, 52% of cybersecurity breaches in 2020 originated from external actors with malicious intent. 

MSPs understand that patch management complexity multiplies when handling large client networks and systems. Manual patch management consumes excessive technician time. This explains why automated patch management solutions like Q Labs have transformed this operational challenge. 

Automated Patch Management for MSPs 

Automated patch management consists of scanning, identifying, downloading, testing, deploying, and verifying system patches without manual intervention. Human technicians cannot monitor systems continuously, but an automated patch management system works perpetually to enhance client security. 

Six-Phase Protocol for MSP Patch Management Selection 

MSPs can select effective patch management tools through an understanding of their specific requirements and priorities. Q Labs recommends these six phases to make appropriate choices that ensure strong cybersecurity and system efficiency for client networks. 

Phase 1: Define MSP Use Cases 

MSPs should carefully analyze their use cases before selecting patch management solutions. Each case requires clear definition to ensure the chosen platform provides complete functionality. For example, MSPs serving clients with varied operating systems need patch management that supports Linux, Windows, and MacOS environments. 

Regardless of specific requirements, MSP patch management tools must offer intuitive interfaces and preferably support automation capabilities to handle multiple client environments efficiently. 

Phase 2: Conduct Market Analysis 

After establishing clear requirements, MSPs should examine available options in the market. Gather comprehensive information about patch management platforms and create comparative assessments of their capabilities relative to your specific client needs. 

Phase 3: Gather Peer Intelligence 

MSPs benefit greatly from consulting fellow service providers who have experience with various patch management products. Read reviews and develop perspective on real-world usage of each platform. These conversations often reveal critical information not mentioned in product marketing materials. 

When consulting other MSPs about their patch management tools, remember that each service provider has unique needs and client profiles. A solution perfect for another MSP might not suit your client portfolio, or vice versa. 

Phase 4: Establish Decision Framework 

With market understanding established, MSPs need objective decision criteria. Create a structured assessment list that includes all relevant factors: overall cost, number of client endpoints supported, price per technician, learning requirements, specific capabilities, third-party patch management, and other relevant considerations. 

This systematic evaluation helps MSPs select patch management platforms that address most requirements at appropriate price points. 

Phase 5: Request Demonstrations 

After narrowing options to a few promising candidates, MSPs should schedule demonstration sessions with each provider. Contact sales teams for walkthroughs of primary capabilities. These sessions allow direct questions about how the product will serve your specific client environments and onboarding processes. 

Phase 6: Conduct Field Tests 

Quality patch management solutions offer trial periods for MSPs to evaluate platforms before commitment. Q Labs provides trial access without credit card requirements, allowing complete freedom to test capabilities. 

This evaluation period proves crucial for MSPs to assess how patch management solutions perform in their specific technical environments. After several weeks of testing, MSPs can make confident decisions about which platform best serves their client needs. 

Six Critical Assessment Factors for MSP Patch Management Selection 

MSPs searching for superior patch management tools should evaluate these six factors during the selection process. 

Automated Discovery Capabilities 

MSPs should select patch management solutions that automatically scan client environments for systems needing updates. Automated scanning and vulnerability management identify available updates and can perform them without technician involvement. MSPs can schedule these processes during maintenance windows to minimize client business disruption. 

Multi-Client Environment Compatibility 

Superior patch management tools offer compatibility with diverse systems and configurations across multiple clients. MSPs forced to use different patch management solutions for various operating systems—or worse, perform some patches manually—inevitably experience missed updates. 

Q Labs prioritizes compatibility for MSP operations. Our automated patch management solution works across major operating systems, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, from a single console. 

Operational Simplicity 

MSPs require patch management tools with intuitive interfaces and straightforward operation. Consider your customization needs and verify that potential solutions offer appropriate flexibility for your client portfolio. User reviews on platforms like G2 and Capterra provide valuable perspective on real-world usability. 

Automation Sophistication 

MSPs should evaluate patch management platforms based on their automation capabilities. Consider your technician availability, client requirements, and operational procedures to determine necessary automation levels. Q Labs provides AI-supported IT management with automated patch management functionality for ticket resolution, script generation, network discovery, and additional capabilities that enhance MSP efficiency. 

Technical Support Quality 

MSPs rely on responsive support when managing critical client systems. Choose providers offering reliable, efficient assistance when needed. Many patch management companies provide knowledge bases and support articles, but few deliver live support when critical issues arise. 

Q Labs offers continuous support in multiple languages, complemented by our exclusive MSP community. This platform allows Q Labs users to exchange IT techniques, troubleshooting approaches, and build professional relationships in a dedicated environment. 

Financial Considerations 

MSPs must evaluate pricing structures carefully for any software acquisition. Define budget parameters before beginning your patch management solution search, then evaluate candidates against these financial guidelines. MSPs should prioritize patch management platforms that scale efficiently with client growth. 

Q Labs: Purpose-Built for MSP Patch Management 

Attention, MSP operatives! Q Labs has engineered patch management technology specifically for service providers managing multiple client environments. Our platform eliminates the need to juggle different patch management tools or waste technician hours on manual updates. 

The Q Labs patch management system provides MSPs with autonomous scanning across client networks, identifying systems requiring updates and applying patches according to your specified protocols. Our multi-client management console gives you complete visibility into patch status across your entire client portfolio from a unified control center. 

Q Labs understands MSP requirements for efficient patch deployment. Our scheduled automation means you can keep client systems current without disrupting their business operations. Patches deploy during maintenance windows, giving your clients seamless protection without performance interruptions. 

For MSPs concerned with financial impacts, our platform offers exceptional value. The cost of implementing Q Labs patch management represents a fraction of what clients might pay for breach remediation. Our solution scales with your client growth without requiring proportional increases in technical staff. 

Contact our field agents today to receive your mission briefing on Q Labs patch management capabilities.  

Need more classified information? Infiltrate our Cleared Access program for top-secret SOPs, automation templates, and more. Your MSP’s success may depend on it. No pressure.